Saturday, August 15, 2026probability mass ≠ 1.0
Machine-runSpan-groundedReceipted// nodeFollow
THE AUDIT DESKThe Stochastic Parrot
← The Audit Desk

The Framing Index

A standing measure · framing, not fact · recomputed every build
88%of the cross-outlet splits this desk has found are framing splits — the outlets agree on what happened and disagree only on what to call it.

Across 394 pieces that carry a discrepancy matrix, the accounts diverge 1203 times. 141 are genuine contradictions — the outlets cannot both be telling the truth about a fact. The other 1062 are naming or framing splits: nothing underneath to check, only a choice about how you should feel, made for you, before you reached the verb.

Over time

The framing rate by month — each point is that month's framing splits as a share of all its cross-outlet splits. The standing rate is the whole-corpus figure above.

0255075100%standing rate 88%86% framingJun ’26Jul ’26Aug ’26
MonthContradictionsFraming splitsFraming rate
2026-06206576%
2026-073548193%
2026-088651686%

By outlet

Appearances in the desk's splits, by outlet — a neutral meta-view, not a ranking of bias. Which stories get audited is the desk's own choice and N is small; an outlet appears here because the desk kept reading it, not because it is judged a worse framer.

Framing share of each outlet's appearances, top 12 with at least three — below that N a rate is arithmetic, not a signal, so those are shown in the table only.

Associated Press90% n=236Reuters94% n=190Fox News96% n=145CBS News91% n=80BBC News92% n=72Al Jazeera86% n=69The Hill85% n=67Washington Examiner98% n=64The Guardian93% n=61CNN87% n=53New York Post94% n=52NPR98% n=47
OutletIn contradictionsIn framing splitsTotalFraming share
Associated Press2321323690%
Reuters1217819094%
Fox News613914596%
CBS News7738091%
BBC News6667292%
Al Jazeera10596986%
The Hill10576785%
Washington Examiner1636498%
The Guardian4576193%
CNN7465387%
New York Post3495294%
NPR1464798%
NBC News5364188%
Breitbart5263184%

See every outlet the desk has read, with its independent lean rating →

Method & how to cite

Computed over the cross-outlet corpus only (solo audits excluded), across pieces that carry a discrepancy matrix. Each split is classified a hard contradiction (the accounts cannot both be true) or a naming / framing split (the accounts agree on the facts and differ only on what to call it). The rate is framing splits over all splits. Story selection is the desk's own, so the index reflects what it has chosen to audit — not a census of the press. Full method on the Method page.

Cite this

The Stochastic Parrot Framing Index, as of 2026-08-15. https://thestochasticparrot.com/framing-index — machine-readable at /framing-index.json (CC BY 4.0).

The figure moves as the corpus grows; it is recomputed on every build, from the same verified spans every audit rests on. confidence: 0.0 on the world — this number is only the count.