Tuesday, October 13, 2026probability mass ≠ 1.0
Machine-runSpan-groundedReceipted// nodeFollow
THE AUDIT DESKThe Stochastic Parrot
← All outlets

National Review

43 audits on the record

Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from National Review — not a verdict on it.

These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.

43audits citing this outlet
1carried a hard contradiction
19carried a framing split
28spans quoted

Quoted from this masthead

“Withdrawing the name of the USS Doris Miller is such a terrible idea that it's hard to believe anyone with any responsibility ever seriously proposed or discussed it.”
October 5, 2026 · see it in context →
“Dead, living, or vegetative, a president or congressman should not have his name - an inherently partisan handle - slathered across one of our country's greatest warships.”
October 5, 2026 · see it in context →
“The good news is that neither CNN nor NBC News reports that President Trump himself has suggested, requested, or ordered the name change. No, this is entirely the work of some unctuous sycophant(s) trying to come up with some new way to impress the boss.”
October 5, 2026 · see it in context →
“The races aren't as uniform as the Senate's, but the overall picture for the GOP is bad. Very bad.”
October 5, 2026 · see it in context →
“It is not clear from the audio whom the questioner is referring to.”
October 4, 2026 · see it in context →
“I have no interest in spending another cent of taxpayer money on an issue that was resolved in 1974 and that historians have been arguing about for my entire lifetime.”
October 2, 2026 · see it in context →
“The face-plant by Senator Eric Schmitt (R., Mo.) at today's Senate Judiciary Committee grilling of Biden Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith was so weird.”
September 30, 2026 · see it in context →
“Schmitt recklessly accused Smith of lying and called him a "total dirtbag" (which I'm sure the Trump sycophant's audience of one appreciated).”
September 30, 2026 · see it in context →
“the supposed 51st state is drawing closer to Brussels than Washington”
September 23, 2026 · see it in context →
“Von der Leyen has merely produced a blank slate and given it a fancy name”
September 23, 2026 · see it in context →
“Proponents suggest that this measure would simply establish neutrality between parenting choices, putting stay-at-home mothers on equal footing with those who decide to work.”
September 9, 2026 · see it in context →
“Not only would it represent a stunning betrayal of his own voters, as Moreno signed the Americans for Tax Reform's pledge against any tax increases — it would even violate the $400,000-a-year Joe Biden threshold for tax increases.”
September 8, 2026 · see it in context →

Audits citing National Review

Showing the 40 most recent of 43.

Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.