Wall Street Journal
4 audits on the record
Every sentence below was reproduced from a frozen snapshot of this masthead’s own page, at the character offset the audit records. This is what the desk has quoted from Wall Street Journal — not a verdict on it.
These numbers are not a fault score. A hard contradiction means two accounts cannot both be true; it does not say which one is wrong, and this desk does not decide. A masthead appears in these counts because it covered a contested story, which is usually a sign it was doing its job. Outlets that publish more, and get read more, appear more. Read the counts as exposure, not as error.
4audits citing this outlet
0carried a hard contradiction
3carried a framing split
1spans quoted
Quoted from this masthead
“The president's remarks touched on a long-running fear of some bond investors: that Washington might try to inflate away its debt by letting rising prices shrink the burden of what it owes, at bondholders' expense.”
October 3, 2026 · see it in context →Audits citing Wall Street Journal
- Trump Said Inflation Could Pay Off the Debt "Very Rapidly." The Markets Desks Heard It; the Political Desks Mostly Didn't.October 3, 2026
- A Third Carrier Sails for the Gulf, and the File's Sharpest Split Is Between "Enters" and "Weighs"October 2, 2026
- OpenAI Canceled a Model That Didn't Quite Meet Its Own Bar. Every Outlet Agreed on the Facts. They Split on What the Facts Were For.September 29, 2026
- Two, Then Five, Then Seven: the Twin Falls In-N-Out deadAugust 3, 2026
Wrong about something here? This masthead has a standing right of reply, and errors go in the corrections ledger.